The “Beauty” Cocktail

Toxins in Cosmetics & Skin Care Products

“The Beauty” Cocktail: Propylene Glycol, Triethanolamine, Parabens.

Different diets, fruits, vegetables, fresh juices, fitness and swimming pool – we study methods and techniques, spend a lot of money because we are accustomed to associate all this with a healthy lifestyle, maintaining our youth and beauty. However, when it’s about cosmetics everything is different – by our polls a very small amount of people reads the full ingredients list, they limit themselves to a prudently his proposed list of “active ingredients”.

While it is no longer a secret that modern cosmetics mainly composed of water and products of chemical & petrochemical synthesis.

It is enough to just quickly read this paragraph:
Methyl – Propyl – Isopropyl – Butyl – Ethyl – Parabens; Imidazolidinyl Urea, Diazolidinyl Urea, 2 – Bromo 2 -Nitropropane-1, 3-diol and other Formaldehyde – releasing preservatives; Methylchloroisothiazolinone and other Isothiazolinone-derived biocides; Phenoxyethanol; Triethanolamine, DEA; Propylene Glycol, PEG; Mineral Oil, Petrolatum; Isopropyl Alcohol; Stearalkonium Chloride, Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), Diethyl& Dibutly phthalate, Fragrance, Dyes et cet.

Looks impressive right? – preservatives, emulsifiers, synthetic oils, stabilizers, enhancers, fragrance), dyes. All this and similar ingredients play a main role in the production of billions of tons of cosmetics by hundreds of different brands. Cheap technology for mass production.

Petroleum is product of nature that makes those components also partly natural, say proponents of the use of these components.
Well, imagine a bartender suggesting you a cocktail which consists of the components described above. Would you try?

Not everything that has been created by nature, you can eat, drink or apply on the skin. Opponents say that there is low-concentration of each of these components contained in these cosmetics. What about daily use for many years? Changing one brand to another, these same “base components” can be applied on the skin for decades.

Useful, natural, nutritional for skin? The Choice is Yours.

Make The Right Decision!

Constantly smoking and drinking alcohol can also be some time without visible effect.

There is no conclusive evidence of harmful effects and people just copy each other’s statements on the internet without evidence? Let’s check it out. For example, a very wide spread preservatives – Parabens.
The preservatives – biocides are not only allergens, but are really able to penetrate the stratum corneum, in contrast to most “active ingredients”. The study, which was published in the article “Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours “(Darbre PD, at al, Journal of Appl Toxicol. 2004 Jan-Feb; 24 (1):5-13.) demonstrated a high concentration of parabens in breast tumors tissue.

In 2012, a new study was published: “Measurement of paraben concentrations in human breast tissue at serial locations across the breast from axilla to sternum” (L Barr, at al. Journal of Applied Toxicology, Vol. 32, (March 2012), p.219 -232). The result was the discovery of one or more species of parabens in 99% (158 of 160) of tumor tissue samples, and five species of parabens were found in 60% of cases.

Based on these studies, is it possible to accurately claim that parabens were one of the causes of cancer, or with the same сonfidence deny it? No you can not – either affirm or deny.
Is it worth your life and health of a definitive answer?
That’s a good question.

There is no need to list in details the consequences of the application of these basic components of mass cosmetics. There is a lot of information on the Internet, and indeed often without reference to serious studies.

Here are the names of only a few research articles to this subject, which speak for themselves and causing a question – whether the use of these components is an “extreme sports” but without any chance to get at least one good benefit for your health?

Reference

  • National Toxicology Program (10 June 2011). “12th Report on Carcinogens”. National Toxicology Program. Retrieved 2011-06-11.
  • Formaldehyde has been classified as a known human carcinogen” International Agency for Research on Cancer (June 2004). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 88 (2006): Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol
  • “Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Contact allergy to formaldehyde and inventory of formaldehyde-releasers”. De Groot, Anton C; Flyvholm, Mari-Ann; Lensen, Gerda; Menné, Torkil; Coenraads, Pieter-Jan. Contact Dermatitis (2009), 61 (2):
    63–85.
  • “Formaldehyde allergy”. DermNet NZ. New Zealand Dermatological Society. June 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
  • “Mutagenicity of cosmetic products containing Kathon” Connor TH, Tee PG, Afshar M, Connor KM. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996; 28(2):127-32. University of Texas Health Scienсe Center, School of Public Health,. Houston,
  • “Isothiazolinone Preservative: Cause Of A Continuing Epidemic Of Cosmetic Dermatitis”, C. De Groot, A. Herxheimer. The Lancet, Volume 333, Issue 8633,
    Pages 314-316 (1989).
  • “Methylisothiazolinone, a neurotoxic biocide, disrupts the association of Src family tyrosine kinases with focal adhesion kinase in developing cortical neurons”. K. He, J. Huang, C. F. Lagenaur, E. Aizenman J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 2006; 317 (3): 1320–1329.
  • “NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of triethanolamine (Cas No. 102-71-6) in B6C3F1 mice (dermal studies).”National Toxicology Program, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2004 May;(518):5-163.
  • “Carcinogenicity of triethanolamine in mice and its mutagenicity after reaction with sodium nitrite in bacteria.” Hoshino H, Tanooka H. Cancer Res. 1978 Nov;38(11 Pt 1):3918-21.
  • “Allergic contact dermatitis from mono-, di- and triethanolamine.” Blum, A. and Lischka, G. Contact Dermatitis 36(3): 166, 1997.
  • “2-Phenoxyethanol: a neurotoxicant?” Schmuck G, Steffens W, Bomhard E. Arch Toxicol. 2000 Jul; 74(4-5):281-7
  • FDA Warns Consumers Against Using Mommy’s Bliss Nipple Cream Product can be harmful to nursing infants
  • “Phenoxyethanol- induced urticaria.” Bohn S, Bircher AJ. Allergy. 2001 Sep; 56(9):922-3.
  • “Positive patch-test reactions to propylene glycol: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006.” Warshaw EM, Botto NC, Maibach et al. Dermatitis 2009 Jan-Feb;20(1):14-20.
  • “Propylene glycol: an often unrecognized cause of allergic contact dermatitis in patients using topical corticosteroids”. Al Jasser M, Mebuke N, de Gannes GC. Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Skin Therapy Lett. 2011 May; 16(5):5-7.”
  • “Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol”. Lessmann, H., Schnuch, A., Geier, J. and Uter, W. Contact Dermatitis 53(5): 247-259, 2005.
  • Contact Dermatitis From Stearyl Alcohol and Propylene Glycol” Alexander A. Fisher, MD. Arch Dermatol. 1974;110(4):636.
  • [Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics] [Article in Spanish] Laguna C, de la Cuadra J, Martín-González B, Zaragoza V, Martínez-Casimiro L, Alegre V. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):53-60.
  • [Contact allergy to cosmetics]. [Article in French] Goossens A, Merckx L. Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Universitaire Saint-Rafaël, Leuven, Belgique. Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1997 Dec;29(10):300-3.
  • Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes. Kirkland DJ, Henderson L, Marzin D, Müller L, Parry JM, Speit G, Tweats DJ, Williams GM. Mutat Res. 2005 Dec 30;588(2):88-105.
  • “Cosmetics as a potential source of environmental contamination in the UK.” Dhanirama D, Gronow J, Voulvoulis N. Environ Technol. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(13-
    15):1597-608.
  • “Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products.” Dodson RE, Nishioka M, Standley LJ, Perovich LJ, at al. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jul; 120(7):935-43.
  • “Neutrophilic and eosinophilic dermatitis caused by contact allergic reaction to paraphenylenediamine in hair dye.” Lönngren V, Young E, at al. Arch Dermatol. 2012 Nov 1; 148(11):1299-301.
  • “Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isopropyl alcohol: a missed allergen?” García avín J, Lissens at al. Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Aug; 65(2)
  • “The stress caused by nitrite with titanium dioxide nanoparticles under UVA irradiation in human keratinocyte cell”. Tu M, Huang Y, Li HL, Gao ZH.
    Toxicology 2012 Sep 4;299(1):60-8.
  • “Effects of Industrial Detergents on the Barrier Function of Human Skin”. Nielsen, G.D. et al. Int. J. Occup. Med. 6(2):138-142, 2000.
  • “Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action”. De Coster S, van Larebeke N. Study Centre for Carcinogenesis and Primary Prevention of Cancer, Department of Radiotherapy and Experimental Cancerology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan Belgium. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:713696. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
  • “Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics.” Hamilton T, de Gannes GC. Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Skin Therapy Lett. 2011 Apr;16(4):1-4.